Tracking curricula tend to do what in relation to disparities?

• A. Entrench inequality
• B. Reduce disparities
• C. Eliminate poverty
• D. No effect

Answer: (A)

Tracking curricula sort students into groups by perceived ability, and this tends to magnify existing inequalities rather than reduce them. When students in higher tracks get access to more challenging coursework, advanced classes, and stronger college-prep support, while those in lower tracks face simpler material, fewer resources, and limited opportunities for college admission, the gaps in achievement and future prospects widen. Over time, these effects compound, affecting grades, test scores, college options, and earnings, which is why this practice tends to entrench inequality. The other options don’t fit because tracking does more than have no effect; it actively alters outcomes in ways that typically increase disparities, and education alone doesn’t eradicate poverty.